Infos sourcées - "santé globale" : environnement, biodiversité, climat, santés humaine et animale

2014 10 balance subv pollution autoengland 150397 pixabay mini Lower rates applied by governments to company cars and diesel fuel in the 27 OECD countries & South Africa were a EUR 26.8 billion of foregone tax revenues in 2012.

But under-taxing of company cars in OECD means an overall cost much higher : an additionnal cost of EUR 150 billions follow from the increase of air pollution, carbon emissions, traffic congestions, road accidents and health ailments (EUR 116 billions additionnal annual cost).


The OECD is calling on governments to stop subsidising company cars and to phase out the diesel tax differential.

OECD recently published a report about diesel use and under-taxing which demonstrates the negative impacts of subsidising company cars and diesel tax tax differential (company cars are half of the amount of new cars in European Union and diesel motors are in 55% of new cars).

Besides the EUR 150 billions cost, OECD emphasizes that 33 of 34 OECD countries apply lower taxes to diesel than to petrol and that diesel cars are in the majority in 23 countries. But trafiic is responsible for ~25% of carbon emissions and are the main cause of air pollution.

It is also known for long than cars using diesel fuel are worse for environment and health than those using petrol fuel:

  • + 18% carbon atoms than petrol (per volume unit)
  • more harmful air pollutants (carbon coumpounds, small particles,...)

And company car owners drive up to three times as much as people with private cars, mainly because of  subsides and lower rates taxes (price of diesel and tax reliefs when driving a company car).

The OECD is calling on governments to stop subsidising company cars and to phase out the diesel tax differential.

Subsidising company cars and diesel tax differential are inconsistent with actions aiming to improve air quality and to lower environment footprint, and they also have an heavy impact on public finances! Let's hope that this economic argument will carry weight...

Source

OCDE : Under-taxing the benefits of company cars 

OCDE : The Diesel Differential 

Sciences participatives

Infos "repères"

Infos en cartes

Infos en vidéo

Livres

A lire ailleurs

Gaz de schiste, un non-sens économique

Depuis cet été, des experts mettent sérieusement en doute le bien-fondé économique de la fracturation hydraulique. «La production des puits décline si rapidement aux Etats-Unis qu’ils ne seront jamais rentables», dit l’expert Tim Morgan dans un article intitulé «Gaz de schiste, la bulle internet de notre temps», paru le 4 août dans le Telegraph. Responsable global de la recherche chez le courtier en énergie Tullett Prebon jusqu’en 2013, il estime que la fracturation, ou fracking, est une absurdité économique.

logo bilan à lire sur bilan.ch

More articles [EN]

What will be the cost of oceans' increasing acidification?

england 150397 pixabay mini Increasing acidification of the oceans is a frightening threat and it is still impossible to decide how huge its economic annual impact will be. But what is sure is that it will have a very longlasting footprint!
You never liked problems about pH at school? You will hate this news!
No. Actually, you will hate it in any case: it is about almost all sea animals finally disapearing because of ocean's acidification...

Lire la suite...

A lire ailleurs

Quand le ministère de l’Intérieur prouve que le vélo n’est pas dangereux

Le 20 juin 2014, le ministère de l’Intérieur publiait des données sur les accidents corporels de la circulation routière. Carfree a récupéré les données sur ces accidents et mener une petite analyse orientée "vélo". Intéressant !

logo carfree à lire sur carfree.fr