Infos sourcées - "santé globale" : environnement, biodiversité, climat, santés humaine et animale

england 150397 pixabay mini While you get ready to hit the road this summer, think twice before hitching a roof racks to your car: added items cost you as much as 25% more in gas! In US, the increasing usage of roof racks (+200% in 2040) may turn into a real concern: they already are responsible for almost 1% of fuel consumption.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory researcher Alan Meier and Yuche Chen of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory have estimated the fuel consumption penalty of roof racks.


Surprising enough, this is the first study of its kind.
The fuel consumption of vehicles with after-market accessories is not included in the test procedure regarding vehicle consumption. And the national global impact was never estimated.

2016 05 07 car 1The researchers estimated the rate of vehicles with roof racks thanks to nationwide highway video surveys. They also created an energy inventory model that included rack usage rates, vehicle stock, vehicle miles traveled through 2040, and vehicle-level roof rack fuel consumption penalties (for both loaded and unloaded roof racks).

They found that in 2015, roof racks were responsible for 0.8% of light-duty vehicle fuel consumption in US, ie 100 million gallons of gasoline. They also proved that the unloaded cross roof racks driven on the highway make the biggest difference because the total miles traveled with unloaded racks is 4 to 8 times higher than that for loaded racks.

Indeed, the point is not about the weight: even if it is empty, a roof racks requires vehicles to expend more energy due to aerodynamic drag. Depending on vehicles, the extra-consumption range from 0 to 25%. And the additional fuel consumption caused by roof racks is about six times larger than anticipated fuel savings from fuel cell vehicles and 40 percent of anticipated fuel savings from battery electric vehicles in 2040.

Solutions

Manufacturers could make roof racks with greatly improved aerodynamics. And the consumers may then be informed with energy labeling of roof racks.

But even in this case, the more obvious and efficient solution is to unsettle vehicle add-on when they are unneeded. Which is also a point the manufacturers could consider: they could design roof racks so as to be easier to remove.

Finally, the researchers estimate that a government policy to minimize unloaded roof racks in combination with more energy-efficient designs would result in cumulative savings of the equivalent of 1.2 billion gallons of gasoline over the next 26 years.

Source 
"Fuel consumption impacts of auto roof racks" published in Energy Policy journal

 

Sciences participatives

Infos "repères"

Infos en cartes

Infos en vidéo

Livres

A lire ailleurs

L'échec des grandes centrales de biomasse

Un rapport publié en décembre 2012 disqualifie la politique énergétique misant sur la biomasse forestière pour produire de l'électricité. Incapables de mobiliser de nouvelles ressources en bois-énergie, les grandes centrales à biomasse fragilisent les filières existantes. Le rapport pointe en revanche le succès des filières locales.

logo novethic à lire sur novethic.fr

More articles [EN]

Under-taxing company cars cost 150 billions Euros a year

2014 10 balance subv pollution autoengland 150397 pixabay mini Lower rates applied by governments to company cars and diesel fuel in the 27 OECD countries & South Africa were a EUR 26.8 billion of foregone tax revenues in 2012.

But under-taxing of company cars in OECD means an overall cost much higher : an additionnal cost of EUR 150 billions follow from the increase of air pollution, carbon emissions, traffic congestions, road accidents and health ailments (EUR 116 billions additionnal annual cost).

Lire la suite...

A lire ailleurs

Aux sources du scandale UraMin

Les étranges affaires d’Areva en Afrique. Championne mondiale du nucléaire, Areva peine à sortir de la tourmente. Aux inquiétudes sur l’avenir de la filière depuis l’accident de Fukushima s’ajoutent les retards des réacteurs de troisième génération en Finlande et à Flamanville. Mais, surtout, l’entreprise publique française est mise en cause pour des investissements suspects dans trois gisements d’uranium africains.

logo monde diplo à lire sur monde-diplomatique.fr